November 19, 2002I want controversy, God damn it
We're studying exculpation in my criminal law class, which means things like self-defense and insanity. For some reason the cases involving exculpation are significantly more controversial than previous cases. We began with the Goetz case, in which a middle-aged white guy shot and severely wounded four black youths on a New York subway in the 1980s. Acquitted of attempted homicide charges. (1) Next up was a longish unit on battered woman syndrome, which included numerous detailed accounts of vicious domestic violence and patterned abuse resulting the wives killing their husbands, and pretty consistently being convicted even when juries were presented with expert testimony regarding BWS. (2) Call me crazy, but I assumed that the class discussions for both of these cases would be heated, emotional, insubstantial, and all around entertaining. My first disappointment was with the Goetz discussion. Nobody really seemed to care about it. Then I realized that there are no black people in my class. All right, fine, but a good 48% of the class are women, and over 1/6 of them went to Berkeley. So I expected the battered women stuff to raise some ire. Again, painfully calm. A few latent feminists piped up but were summarily and gently swatted down by the professor. Tomorrow will be the test. For tomorrow, in the context of the "necessity" defense, we discuss Public Committee Against Torture v. State of Israel. Ooh, baby. (1) This case was turned into an episode of Law & Order, but the racial element was more or less devoured by a gender element by turning the middle-aged white guy into a young white woman, and turning the request for money into a sexual comment. (2) The chapter on BWS was my favorite so far, because it had an actual punchline. The book sets you up with all these appalling accounts of men abusing women and women being convicted after killing them, and you think that's really terrible, and then it ends with a comment by a law professor to the effect of, "We have enough trouble getting people on board with the death penalty, which is killing someone after a lengthy court trial, let alone allowing a woman to try, convict, sentence, and execute her husband in her living room."
Comments
I think battered women should be allowed to kill their husbands. unless the women were asking for it. lummox for lummox, i'm inclined to agree with you provided the battered woman has exhausted other alternatives. there was one case in which the wife was physically dragged out of a social services office by her husband when she tried to file a report against him, and social services did nothing. she ended up shooting him while he was asleep and was convicted of the homicide since the danger to her life wasn't "imminent" at the time of the killing. although BWS is presented as a self-defense style phenomenon i think it's more a matter of governmental incompetence at protecting its citizens, which speaks to issues regarding the right of protection, which in turn dovetails nicely into the second amendment. i bring this up only to point out while NOW and the NRA are at odds on almost everything else, redefining the basis for the BWS defense just might bring them into the same bed. Posted by: holohan on November 20, 2002 12:14 PMYou know how when I got serious about my blog I stopped emailing you and developed an attitude of, 'What? Just read the blog and talk to the comments'? Well I think you just got me back. Welcome to CH. ps I know nothing about the law. Posted by: didofoot on November 20, 2002 12:21 PMOn the radio the other day people were calling in to talk about weird things that they eat. One man called up to say that he knew it was gross but he loves barbecued lamb balls. The host immediately instructed him to send NOW the recipe as it would provide them with an official dish. Posted by: the girlfriend on November 20, 2002 02:08 PMgives a whole nother meaning to the phrase "ate my balls," doesn't it? Posted by: holohan on November 20, 2002 03:05 PMi gave a friend a cookbook with a recipe for bull penis once. i don't think she ever made it though. Posted by: michele on November 20, 2002 03:15 PMWhere do you purchase bull penis? Do you have to grow your own? Posted by: brian on November 20, 2002 05:21 PMapparently deer penis soup is a delicacy in china. so is personal freedom. Posted by: holohan on November 20, 2002 06:20 PMin china it's a commonly held belief that eating bull penis or deer penis will improve the male vigor. however it is very shameful to actually have to admit to needing that kind of supplement. it's a delicate conundrum. Posted by: michele on November 20, 2002 07:23 PMintriguing. does that mean that eating small penises will decrease male vigor, and if so, might that be an effective way of deterring child molesters and other sexual predators? i think we're onto something here. Posted by: holohan on November 20, 2002 07:41 PMgerbil penis casserole as mandatory prison food. this will also be beneficial to smaller men in prison, or "bitches," who have a headache and are hoping their gentleman callers will let them off the hook. Posted by: didofoot on November 22, 2002 08:52 AMPerhaps NOW should thus take up the cause of discriminatory genital eating habits: are a woman's genitals less of a delicacy than a man's? Could it be that there is an international male plot to discriminate against the illicit consumption of animal vaginas? Woman, rally and rise up against this gustatory oppression! Vagina- it's what's for feminista dinner. Posted by: #1 big boob asian queen on November 22, 2002 01:37 PMhmm that's interesting considering that the phrases "blow me" and "eat me" refer to respectively. Posted by: michele on November 22, 2002 01:41 PMthat should be "what the phrases" not "that." sorry. Posted by: michele on November 22, 2002 01:42 PM"eat me" is so pleading, isn't it? as if begging for gender equality on the world's dinner table. eat me, men of china and so forth! eat of my ovaries and so on! Posted by: didofoot on November 22, 2002 02:42 PMhere's one woman who's taken that plea straight to the inter-web: http://www.chrissycaviar.com/ Posted by: holohan on November 22, 2002 03:16 PMA very "Stranger in a Strange Land" feeling to it. Eat of me. Very appropriate for the holiday season. Interesting to think of the transubstantiation assumed by the folklore surrounding the consumption of animal genitals. Well, animal penises and testicles, in accordance with the international oppressive plot against eating women. Posted by: #1 big boob asian queen on November 22, 2002 03:18 PMPost a comment |
Recent Entries
Caption Contest
The Olympics are Stupid Vindicated Colorado and Three-Letter Words I Need to Stop Deleting Comments Small Children Riding Sheep: A Day at the Arapahoe County Fair Shooting Fish in a Barrel / Bidi Bidi Bidi Thoughts on the Third Circuit's Super Bowl Ruling Some Denver Photos Our First Denver Area Social Outing, and How It Went
Other Blogs
Mollynonymous
Octopus Hat Attack of the Z Bigstupidjerkface Carthage Chuntastic Doubting Tommaso Flores Family Herbie the Love Blog Ice Cream Making and Ranting Jew in the Room Maisnon Mognet Central Marie the Bee Meish's Musings No Pants Astronomy PostSecret Shutter Monkey Sunship Balloons Velvet Winter VVV Zembla
Law-Type Blogs
Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
Balkinization Concurring Opinions California Employee Rights Blog Dorf on Law First Amendment Center Go West, Young (Wo)Man! How Appealing The Intersection KatSCAN Lack of Scienter LawGeek Legal Insanity Legalities MODern Life The Neutral Zone Trap Ninth Circuit Blog Nuts & Boalts Patently-O Real World: Austin Religion Clause SCOTUS Blog Southern California Law Blog Technology & Marketing Law Blog Two-Timing the Cosmos Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Other Webcomics
Big Fat Whale
Cyanide and Happiness My New Fighting Technique is Unstoppable Penny Arcade Perry Bible Fellowship Red Meat xkcd
Log Archives
August 2008
July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002
Search
|