June 04, 2007FCC Finally Gets Taken Down a PegThe Second Circuit today struck down the FCC's new "fleeting expletives" policy, and in doing so had a lot to say about the FCC's indecency jurisdiction in general. As part of its crackdown in 2003-2004, the FCC started giving harsher treatment to four-letter words, beginning with Bono's unbleeped F-bomb during the January 2003 broadcast of the Golden Globes. In the Golden Globes decision the Commission acknowledged that it was changing the rules by holding that certain words were inherently verboten regardless of context (unlike the Supreme Court, the FCC at least owns up when it's throwing away its precedents). The Second Circuit case dealt with another broadcast to which the new rules were later applied, and here's the money shot: We find that the FCC's new policy regarding "fleeting expletives" represents a significant departure from positions previously taken by the agency and relied on by the broadcast industry. We further find that the FCC has failed to articulate a reasoned basis for this change in policy. Accordingly, we hold that the FCC's new policy regarding "fleeting expletives" is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The petition for review is therefore granted, the order of the FCC is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Commission for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because we vacate the FCC's order on this ground, we do not reach the other challenges to the FCC's indecency regime raised by petitioners, intervenors, and amici. Although the court therefore didn't squarely reach the broader challenges, it did discuss the myriad constitutional issues raised by the FCC's indecency policies in some detail. The Progress & Freedom Foundation Blog has this slow-loading post with excerpts and analysis. I haven't read the opinions yet (though they may make for good airplane reading on my trip to Mexico later this week). I may have my own thoughts after I do. In the meantime, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin and Commissioner Michael J. Copps are cursing mad about the decision, and assure us that the FCC will continue to protect the rights of parents to have the government decide what their children can watch on television.
Comments
Post a comment |
Recent Entries
Voila Mon Passport*
Beer Ice Cream Tastes Like Beer in Ice Cream Form Lawyer Mode Activated Cohen v. California in T-Shirt Form Stop All the Hadron Collidin' Messin' Around with the New Camera Supreme Court Sitcoms Say Goodbye to Your Afternoon The First of Many Posts About Adventures in Buying Baby Crap On Subtlety
Other Blogs
Mollynonymous
Octopus Hat Attack of the Z Bigstupidjerkface Carthage Chuntastic Doubting Tommaso Flores Family Herbie the Love Blog Ice Cream Making and Ranting Jew in the Room Maisnon Mognet Central Marie the Bee Meish's Musings No Pants Astronomy PostSecret Shutter Monkey Sunship Balloons Velvet Winter VVV Zembla
Law-Type Blogs
Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
Balkinization Concurring Opinions California Employee Rights Blog Dorf on Law First Amendment Center Go West, Young (Wo)Man! How Appealing The Intersection KatSCAN Lack of Scienter LawGeek Legal Insanity Legalities MODern Life The Neutral Zone Trap Ninth Circuit Blog Nuts & Boalts Patently-O Real World: Austin Religion Clause SCOTUS Blog Southern California Law Blog Technology & Marketing Law Blog Two-Timing the Cosmos Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Other Webcomics
Big Fat Whale
Cyanide and Happiness My New Fighting Technique is Unstoppable Penny Arcade Perry Bible Fellowship Red Meat xkcd
Log Archives
April 2008
March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002
Search
|