November 05, 2007The FCC Goes to the USSCThe FCC has filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court appealing the Second Circuit ruling (which I blogged about here) striking down the Commission's eminently crappy "fleeting expletives" policy. SCOTUSblog has a lengthy discussion here with many an excerpt from the government's petition. Here are a few reasons why this isn't very exciting. First, the Second Circuit gave the FCC an opportunity to explain itself and save its policy rather than striking down the policy all together. The FCC didn't do this, and instead went straight to the Supreme Court. The government had its reasons for this approach, but given the Roberts Court's distaste for actually hearing and deciding cases, this little procedural foible will give the Court all the reason it needs to deny cert. Second, the precise issue presented in the cert petition is one of statutory interpretation rather than constitutionality. So, even if the Court does decide to take the case, the Court is unlikely to get into the constitutionality of the FCC's indecency jurisdiction given the Roberts Court's penchant for deciding cases on narrow, boring, and unhelpful grounds. The Second Circuit opinion had a lot of dicta about the constitutionality of the FCC's indecency regime but ultimately decided the case on statutory interpretation. Finally, one of the most glaring themes that has come out of the Roberts Court over the past two years has been "Hooray for the government," so if the Court reaches the merits of the case the FCC is likely to come out on top. And that's Bad for America, my friends. So, I'll be keeping an eye on this as it develops but I'm not getting my hopes up.
Comments
At the risk of sounding ignorant, how does the SC decide which cases to hear/not to hear? Do they have a big slumber party and pick names out of a hat? How does this work? Posted by: DrMH on November 5, 2007 10:46 AMI think the rule is that it takes four Justices to grant cert, and they decide (except for Justice Stevens) based on memos generated by clerks in the "cert pool," a division of labor among the clerks to facilitate the cert review process. They have conferences and vote on cert petitions just like they vote when they decide cases. Justice Stevens is the only one who actually reviews every single cert petition, or at least has his clerks review every one. I could be wrong about any or all of that. Posted by: matt on November 5, 2007 11:41 AMPost a comment |
Recent Entries
Voila Mon Passport*
Beer Ice Cream Tastes Like Beer in Ice Cream Form Lawyer Mode Activated Cohen v. California in T-Shirt Form Stop All the Hadron Collidin' Messin' Around with the New Camera Supreme Court Sitcoms Say Goodbye to Your Afternoon The First of Many Posts About Adventures in Buying Baby Crap On Subtlety
Other Blogs
Mollynonymous
Octopus Hat Attack of the Z Bigstupidjerkface Carthage Chuntastic Doubting Tommaso Flores Family Herbie the Love Blog Ice Cream Making and Ranting Jew in the Room Maisnon Mognet Central Marie the Bee Meish's Musings No Pants Astronomy PostSecret Shutter Monkey Sunship Balloons Velvet Winter VVV Zembla
Law-Type Blogs
Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
Balkinization Concurring Opinions California Employee Rights Blog Dorf on Law First Amendment Center Go West, Young (Wo)Man! How Appealing The Intersection KatSCAN Lack of Scienter LawGeek Legal Insanity Legalities MODern Life The Neutral Zone Trap Ninth Circuit Blog Nuts & Boalts Patently-O Real World: Austin Religion Clause SCOTUS Blog Southern California Law Blog Technology & Marketing Law Blog Two-Timing the Cosmos Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Other Webcomics
Big Fat Whale
Cyanide and Happiness My New Fighting Technique is Unstoppable Penny Arcade Perry Bible Fellowship Red Meat xkcd
Log Archives
April 2008
March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002
Search
|