November 06, 2003Law One, TSW ZeroWarning: This entry contains an abnormally high level of law geekdom. The other day I became one of the first consumers in the tragic history of software licensing to use a shrink-wrap user agreement to my advantage. Last week I bought a copy of Microsoft Office, got it home and realized I didn't want / need it. So I brought it back, unopened, whence I bought it. As predicted I was met with a rhetorical, "You are aware of our no returns policy?" And indeed I was. In response I pointed out that the software was unopened, and told the guy that I didn't accept the end user license agreement. I then pointed to the fine print on the box that said I should go to www.microsoft.com/blahblahblah and read the EULA before opening the package, and if I didn't accept it I was entitled to a refund. The TSW guy read the fine print, frowned, and sought the assistance of someone who brought down a higher hourly wage than he did. Eventually I got the refund, but while the woman was processing it she asked (our of curiosity) what specifically I objected to in the license agreement since she had never had anyone do this before. Since I hadn't actually read the damn thing I just said, "I'm a law student. What can I say?" The best part is that the shrink wrap agreement was with Microsoft, not the store, so they could have told me to try and get a refund from Microsoft. But I guess they figured that once people start trying to use the Law against you it's better to buy them off for nuisance value rather than try and push merits or technicalities.
Comments
Mm. IIRC the ProCD case (which is fairly lousy, though well-established; Klocek v. Gateway is better IMO) did point out that in order for EULAs to be effective, rejection and return would have to be available. Now, I sincerely doubt that J. Easterbrook ever tried to return software, but at least there's something that even such an ardent supporter of EULAs has provided the other side with in order to oppose them. Posted by: cpt kangarooski on November 7, 2003 03:02 AMI did this at a Sam's Club last year. Bought a copy of a Microsoft DTP/Print Shop Clone 2003, loaded it up, saw that it was a POS and put it back in the box and returned it to the store, which had a no returns policy on OPENED software. They grudgingly took it back, which says something because all the Sam's clubs I've delt with are real hard asses about returns. Post a comment |
Recent Entries
Colorado and Three-Letter Words
I Need to Stop Deleting Comments Small Children Riding Sheep: A Day at the Arapahoe County Fair Shooting Fish in a Barrel / Bidi Bidi Bidi Thoughts on the Third Circuit's Super Bowl Ruling Some Denver Photos Our First Denver Area Social Outing, and How It Went Moving to Colorado, BRB Here Comes Horse Conversations With My Wife: Former Presidents Edition
Other Blogs
Mollynonymous
Octopus Hat Attack of the Z Bigstupidjerkface Carthage Chuntastic Doubting Tommaso Flores Family Herbie the Love Blog Ice Cream Making and Ranting Jew in the Room Maisnon Mognet Central Marie the Bee Meish's Musings No Pants Astronomy PostSecret Shutter Monkey Sunship Balloons Velvet Winter VVV Zembla
Law-Type Blogs
Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
Balkinization Concurring Opinions California Employee Rights Blog Dorf on Law First Amendment Center Go West, Young (Wo)Man! How Appealing The Intersection KatSCAN Lack of Scienter LawGeek Legal Insanity Legalities MODern Life The Neutral Zone Trap Ninth Circuit Blog Nuts & Boalts Patently-O Real World: Austin Religion Clause SCOTUS Blog Southern California Law Blog Technology & Marketing Law Blog Two-Timing the Cosmos Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Other Webcomics
Big Fat Whale
Cyanide and Happiness My New Fighting Technique is Unstoppable Penny Arcade Perry Bible Fellowship Red Meat xkcd
Log Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002
Search
|