January 20, 2003Digital Cable Goes DigitalA new strip has been posted for all to see and muse over. Our inspiration this week comes from the fact that a growing number of people in my class, especially me, are finding that Constitutional Law is as dull as toast while Property (Property, for God's sake) is closer to to the "girls making out" end of the boredom spectrum. Our eyes glaze over like honey hams at the mere mention of Brown v. Board, but you get us going on the finer points of gifts inter vivos and we'll start missing meals.* (Anonymous grading aside, I'd just like to say that it's more a function of the material than the professors. I can't read more than three pages of my Con Law book without taking a nap, whereas the pages of the Property text fly by like I'm reading Chuck Palahniuk. Hooray, professors. I love you all.) I have my own theories as to why our opinions have fallen where they have, but whenever I try to explain any of them I always end up saying, "Law students are arrogant and insensitive. And so's my dick." Accordingly I'll open it up to public opinion via the handy dandy comments feature below. In other news, I went to dinner with the girlfriend, John, Julie, and John's mother the other night (a little family-owned** Italian place in Sunset Beach -- great food, reasonable prices, lonely bartenders, quite an experience) and we decided that heterosexual women can be lumped into two groups: those who think Legolas is hot and those who think Aragorn is hot. (If X-Men is more your thing, you can use Cyclops and Wolverine.) The girlfriend is an Aragorn/Wolverine girl, which means that I need to stop being such a sissymary. I'll work on that. Finally, Mimi the cat has a cold. If anyone knows any cold remedies for cats please send them along. I'm tired of having her sneeze on me. *You see, because we'll be so busy talking about Property that we'll forget to eat. **The original draft lacked a hyphen between "family" and "owned," resulting in the sense that the restaurant was owned by a little family, or a family of little people. It's like those old grade school aptitude tests where you had to eliminate sentences like "Joan watched a parade on her front lawn."
Comments
I'd like to interpose here with a corollary- I said that Wolverine was hot, no question there. However, Aragorn needs to find his way to a blow drier. I don't understand how, but his hair is wet or damp in EVERY shot! He must have had mildew on his scalp by the end of shooting. Posted by: Nobbaq on January 21, 2003 11:56 AMand i've got to say that i find aragorn AND legolas excessively hot, so i dunno if women can be divided into these seperate camps of thought of yours so easily... revise your theory! Posted by: michele on January 21, 2003 12:20 PMwhereas i was really drawn to gandalf/dr.wheels (or whatever patrick stuart's xmen character's name is). but that is a problem i'm getting help for. nobbaq: definitely in your camp on the aragorn hair. my theory is that the elf and dwarf, resentful over taking orders from a human, take turns spitting on his head all night while he's asleep. patrick stuart?!?! woman!!! that's ian mckellen!!! ahhh!! i don't know you anymore! strike your name from the memory banks! p.s. though, spitting! funny! Posted by: michele on January 22, 2003 01:41 PMMaybe she's drawn to both those characters and is not confusing Ian McKellan for Patrick Stewart. And while I understand the Patrick Stewart thing I think Kristen always goes for the wacked out wise characters. Ahem... Giles on Buffy, Gandalf in LOTR, and Savah in Elfquest (although she's a girl it was her favorite character). I'm sure there are more. She likes them deep thinkers. Too bad they're always really old. Posted by: Nuala on January 22, 2003 01:48 PMoh i see what you think she is saying.....interesting, have you noticed that in both xmen and lotr that ian mckellen likes to say the word "hope" a lot. but in one he is pro and the other he is against. fascinating. no really. i have no life. NO. Really. Posted by: michele on January 22, 2003 01:55 PMyeah, not mckellen. in either film. i like patrick all the way, and theodan...i like the strong older men who WIN, not the ones who LOSE. dammit what was his name though. professor something? Posted by: didofoot on January 22, 2003 02:35 PMprofessor Xavier? leader of the X-men. i don't think i can stress these X'S enough here. theoden sucked ass and was ugly. but then so was lucius malfoy and you have a thing for him too....i think actually, nuala, kristen's predilection is for ugly, stupid guys. (sorry gene). Posted by: michele on January 22, 2003 02:39 PMmind you mckellan won in LOTR. but his nose was all weird. can i point out i was also attracted to dumbledore. Posted by: didofoot on January 22, 2003 02:41 PMjust so we're clear, ian mckellen is in x-men, but patrick stewart plays professor charles "dr. wheels" xavier, or "professor x." ian mckellen plays the more sinister and able-bodied eric mangus "magneto" lensherr. does the fact that i never really read the comic book make this knowledge all the more doarkey? Posted by: holohan on January 22, 2003 02:43 PMyeah but you know at least my prediliction is also for three-dimensional men who are of age, as opposed to two dimensional boys in short pants. ms. mocky mcmockerton. Posted by: didofoot on January 22, 2003 02:44 PMSo wait, you're not drawn to gandalf? You were just trying to state is was all about Mr. Patrick Stewart? Who you thought played gandalf? Posted by: Nuala on January 22, 2003 02:45 PMoh, wait. i did say i was drawn to gandalf didn't i. well i WAS, in the book. but in the movie no. see: all my actions this week re: I am dumb. Posted by: didofoot on January 22, 2003 02:50 PMps at no point did i think patrick stuart was in LOTR or ian was in a wheelchair. i am dumb but not THAT dumb. Posted by: didofoot on January 22, 2003 02:51 PMI think "Dr. Wheels" is a better name than "Professor X," especially since the X-Men are, at their core, just a superhero version of the multi-racial, tolerance-minded Wee Pals of comic strip fame. Posted by: sean on January 22, 2003 02:58 PMit's true. token disabled guy, token steel-clawed guy...it's such a pacific bell ad. Posted by: didofoot on January 22, 2003 03:06 PMPost a comment |
Recent Entries
Moving to Colorado, BRB
Here Comes Horse Conversations With My Wife: Former Presidents Edition Lessons from My First Game of Ultimate [Frisbee]* This is a Post About the Lost Season Finale The Strangers and The Sixth Sense Are the Same Movie Book Shaming Note to Self: Do Not Allow Children to Prepare My Food In the Summer Associate Time Borrowed Thoughts on the California Marriage Decision
Other Blogs
Mollynonymous
Octopus Hat Attack of the Z Bigstupidjerkface Carthage Chuntastic Doubting Tommaso Flores Family Herbie the Love Blog Ice Cream Making and Ranting Jew in the Room Maisnon Mognet Central Marie the Bee Meish's Musings No Pants Astronomy PostSecret Shutter Monkey Sunship Balloons Velvet Winter VVV Zembla
Law-Type Blogs
Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
Balkinization Concurring Opinions California Employee Rights Blog Dorf on Law First Amendment Center Go West, Young (Wo)Man! How Appealing The Intersection KatSCAN Lack of Scienter LawGeek Legal Insanity Legalities MODern Life The Neutral Zone Trap Ninth Circuit Blog Nuts & Boalts Patently-O Real World: Austin Religion Clause SCOTUS Blog Southern California Law Blog Technology & Marketing Law Blog Two-Timing the Cosmos Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Other Webcomics
Big Fat Whale
Cyanide and Happiness My New Fighting Technique is Unstoppable Penny Arcade Perry Bible Fellowship Red Meat xkcd
Log Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002
Search
|